Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:41:22 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/psi.c: Rudimentary typo fixes |
| |
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:00:18PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:12:33PM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > > > > s/possible/possible/ > > s/ exceution/execution/ > > s/manupulations/manipulations/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> > > --- > > kernel/sched/psi.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c > > index 967732c0766c..316ebc57a115 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/psi.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c > > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ > > * states, we would have to conclude a CPU SOME pressure number of > > * 100%, since *somebody* is waiting on a runqueue at all > > * times. However, that is clearly not the amount of contention the > > - * workload is experiencing: only one out of 256 possible exceution > > + * workload is experiencing: only one out of 256 possible execution > > I thought this was the french spelling. > > Joking aside, the corrections look right, but I also had no trouble > understanding what those sentences mean. Typos happen, plus we have a > lot of non-native speakers who won't use perfect spelling or grammar. > > So for me, the bar is "this can be easily understood", not "needs to > be perfect English", and I'd say let's skip patches like these unless > they fix something truly unintelligble.
Ignore this robot, lots of people already have a special mail rule for him. On top of that, this spelling mistake was already fixed by Ingo in:
3b03706fa621 ("sched: Fix various typos")
Which is part of a series of such patches to head off the endless, mindless, stream of this.
| |