Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Mar 2021 01:33:48 +0530 | From | Bhaskar Chowdhury <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix a typo |
| |
On 14:47 Fri 26 Mar 2021, David Sterba wrote: >On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:29:32AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: >> >> s/reponsible/responsible/ > >So this is exactly what I don't want to see happen - one patch per typo. >I tried to explain it in the previous patch, please either fix all typos >under fs/btrfs or don't bother.
As I mentioned in my previous correspondence to , I have my way of doing thing . The problem is , you are getting accustomed with some specific method and you are thinking that is the "only way" of doing the "right thing" . Please , think others are also think in different way too.
The goal to make it looks good and productive...don't you think so???
..and I said I do bother ,it's just not about this specific segment but about the whole kernel.
Or is it some sort of special flow brtfs subsystem are following , which I am not aware off??
Please do let me. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |