lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH][next] loop: Fix missing max_active argument in alloc_workqueue call
From
Date
On 3/18/21 9:16 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The 3rd argument to alloc_workqueue should be the max_active count,
> however currently it is the lo->lo_number that is intended for the
> loop%d number. Fix this by adding in the missing max_active count.

Dan, please fold this (or something similar) in when you're redoing the
series.

--
Jens Axboe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-18 21:13    [W:0.118 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site