lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI_ADC)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/21 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week.
> >
> > Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1,
> > so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
> >
> > News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
> > v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please
> > consider rebasing it onto v5.12-rc2. Also, please check any branches
> > merged into your branch.
> >
> > Changes since 20210315:
>
>
> on i386 or x86_64:
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ADI_AXI_ADC
> Depends on [n]: IIO [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && OF [=n]
> Selected by [y]:
> - AD9467 [=y] && IIO [=y] && SPI [=y]
>
>
> AD9467 should not select ADI_AXI_ADC when OF is not enabled,
> so possibly AD9467 should depend on OF.

Hmm, this becomes a bit complicated.
We got here because we needed to add a depends on HAS_IOMEM for the
ADI_AXI_ADC (due to the s390 arch).
Maybe a better fix would be for AD9467 to depend on ADI_AXI_ADC.
The AD9467 driver can't function without the ADI_AXI_ADC driver.

It is a little early to move this to a "high-speed ADC" subgroup.

>
>
> Full randconfig file is attached.
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-17 09:18    [W:0.060 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site