Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:31:48 +0000 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [v2][PATCH] Revert "mfd: syscon: Don't free allocated name for regmap_config" |
| |
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Li, Meng wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 2:15 AM > > To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@windriver.com> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > arnd@arndb.de; Hao, Kexin <Kexin.Hao@windriver.com> > > Subject: Re: [v2][PATCH] Revert "mfd: syscon: Don't free allocated name for > > regmap_config" > > > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > > > On Tue, 09 Mar 2021, Li, Meng wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 5:43 PM > > > > To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@windriver.com> > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > > > arnd@arndb.de; Hao, Kexin <Kexin.Hao@windriver.com> > > > > Subject: Re: [v2][PATCH] Revert "mfd: syscon: Don't free allocated > > > > name for regmap_config" > > > > > > > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Li, Meng wrote: > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 5:21 PM > > > > > > To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > > > > > > Cc: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@windriver.com>; > > > > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; arnd@arndb.de; Hao, Kexin > > > > > > <Kexin.Hao@windriver.com> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [v2][PATCH] Revert "mfd: syscon: Don't free > > > > > > allocated name for regmap_config" > > > > > > > > > > > > [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Limeng, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2021-02-22 03:45, Li, Meng wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Marc&Lee, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any comment on this patch? > > > > > > > > Could you please help to review this patch so that I can > > > > > > > > improve it if it still has weakness? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are confident that the root issue has been fixed, no > > > > > > > objection from me, but I'm not in a position to test it at the > > > > > > > moment (the board I found the problem on is in a bit of a state). > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not keen on flip-flopping this patch in and out of the kernel. > > > > > > Someone really needs to spend some time to map out the full > > > > > > life-cycle and propose a (possibly cross-subsystem) solution. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all of your comments. > > > > > > > > Have you looked into this further at all? > > > > > > > > > > No. > > > Maintainer expects better solution to solve this issue from frame level, and > > consider cross-subsystem. > > > > Yes, I do. Does that mean you're going to drop it? > > > > Thanks for fixing this issue. > Please discard my patch, I will not do further effort and drop it.
For the record, this has not been fixed.
Someone still needs to work on a suitable fix for this issue.
-- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
| |