Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:58:17 +0100 | From | Oscar Salvador <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] x86/vmemmap: Handle unpopulated sub-pmd ranges |
| |
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:58:26PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Thinking again, I guess it might be a good idea to factor out the core > functions into common code. For the optimization part, it might make sense > too pass some "state" structure that contains e.g., "unused_pmd_start".
Yeah, that really sounds like a good thing to do.
> > Then we don't have diverging implementations of essentially the same thing. > > Of course, we can do that on top of this series - unifying both > implementations.
I would rather do it on top of this series, not because I am lazy, but rather fairly busy and I will not be able to spend much time on it anytime soon.
Once this series gets merged, I commit to have a look into that.
Thanks!
-- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3
| |