lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.14 27/50] mm, slub: consider rest of partial list if acquire_slab() fails
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:43:33AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Just a note to the stable tree: this commit has been reverted
> upstream, because it causes a huge performance drop (admittedly on a
> load and setup that may not be all that relevant to most people).
>
> It was applied to 4.4, 4.9 and 4.12, because the commit it was marked
> as "fixing" is from 2012, but it turns out that the early exit from
> the loop in that commit was very much intentional, and very much shows
> up on scalability benchmarks.
>
> I don't think this is likely to be a big deal for the stable kernels -
> we're basically talking tuning for special cases, and while it is
> reverted in my tree now, the "correct" thing to do is likely to be a
> bit more flexible than either "exit loop immediately" or "loop for as
> long as we have contention".
>
> In practice, most machines probably won't see either case - or it will
> at least be rare enough that you can't tell.
>
> The machine that reports a huge performance drop was a multi-socket
> machine under fairly extreme conditions, and these contention issues
> are often close to exponential - a smaller machine (or a slighly less
> extreme load) would never see the issue at all either way.
>
> See
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210301080404.GF12822@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
>
> for details if you care. I don't think this has to necessarily be
> undone in the stable trees, this email is more of an incidental note
> just as a heads-up.

Thanks for the details, I'll look into reverting it in a future stable
release.

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-03-10 19:52    [W:0.128 / U:0.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site