lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent for v5.11-rc7
Date


> On Feb 9, 2021, at 8:45 AM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:49 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:32:34 +0100 (CET)
>>> Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> powerpc has this
>>>
>>> static inline unsigned long klp_get_ftrace_location(unsigned long faddr)
>>> {
>>> /*
>>> * Live patch works only with -mprofile-kernel on PPC. In this case,
>>> * the ftrace location is always within the first 16 bytes.
>>> */
>>> return ftrace_location_range(faddr, faddr + 16);
>>> }
>>>
>>>>> I suppose the trivial fix is to see if it points to endbr64 and if so,
>>>>> increment the addr by the length of that.
>>>>
>>>> I thought of that too. But one thing that may be possible, is to use
>>>> kallsym. I believe you can get the range of a function (start and end of
>>>> the function) from kallsyms. Then ask ftrace for the addr in that range
>>>> (there should only be one).
>>>
>>> And we can do this if a hard-coded value live above is not welcome. If I
>>> remember correctly, we used to have exactly this in the old versions of
>>> kGraft. We walked through all ftrace records, called
>>> kallsyms_lookup_size_offset() on every record's ip and if the offset+ip
>>> matched faddr (in this case), we returned the ip.
>>
>> Either way is fine. Question is, should we just wait till CET is
>> implemented for the kernel before making any of these changes? Just knowing
>> that we have a solution to handle it may be good enough for now.
>
> I think the issue is more fundamental than what appears on the surface.
> According to endbr64 documentation it's not just any instruction.
> The cpu will wait for it and if it's replaced with int3 or not seen at
> the branch target the cpu will throw an exception.
> If I understood the doc correctly it means that endbr64 can never be
> replaced with a breakpoint. If that's the case text_poke_bp and kprobe
> need to do extra safety checks.

Ugh.

Or we hack up #CP to handle this case. I don’t quite know how I feel about this.
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-09 17:57    [W:0.106 / U:4.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site