[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 resend 00/13] MFD/extcon/ASoC: Rework arizona codec jack-detect support

On 2/9/21 3:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2021, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi Mark, Lee,
>> On 2/4/21 12:24 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Here is v4 of my series to rework the arizona codec jack-detect support
>>> to use the snd_soc_jack helpers instead of direct extcon reporting.
>>> This is a resend with some extra *-by tags collected and with the extcon
>>> folks added to the "To:" list, which I somehow missed with the original
>>> v4 posting, sorry.
>>> This is done by reworking the extcon driver into an arizona-jackdet
>>> library and then modifying the codec drivers to use that directly,
>>> replacing the old separate extcon child-devices and extcon-driver.
>>> This brings the arizona-codec jack-detect handling inline with how
>>> all other ASoC codec driver do this. This was developed and tested on
>>> a Lenovo Yoga Tablet 1051L with a WM5102 codec.
>>> This was also tested by Charles Keepax, one of the Cirrus Codec folks.
>>> This depends on the previously posted "[PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add
>>> support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec" series and there
>>> are various interdependencies between the patches in this series.
>>> Lee Jones, the MFD maintainer has agreed to take this series upstream
>>> through the MFD tree and to provide an immutable branch for the ASoC
>>> and extcon subsystems to merge.
>>> Mark and extcon-maintainers may we have your ack for merging these
>>> through the MFD tree ?
>> Now that the pre-cursor (1) series to this has been merged, I guess it
>> is time to decide how to merge this series.
>> Chanwoo Choi has given his ack to merge the extcon bits through the MFD
>> tree and since Mark has expressed a preference for merging ASOC patches
>> directly I guess that it would be best to merge 1-6 through the MFD
>> tree and then Lee can send Mark a pull-req and Mark can apply the others? :
>> 1/13 mfd: arizona: Drop arizona-extcon cells
>> 2/13 extcon: arizona: Fix some issues when HPDET IRQ fires after the jack has been unplugged
>> 3/13 extcon: arizona: Fix various races on driver unbind
>> 4/13 extcon: arizona: Fix flags parameter to the gpiod_get("wlf,micd-pol") call
>> 5/13 extcon: arizona: Always use pm_runtime_get_sync() when we need the device to be awake
>> 6/14 ASoC/extcon: arizona: Move arizona jack code to sound/soc/codecs/arizona-jack.c
>> 1 is: Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <>
>> 2-6 are: Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <>
>> Note patch 6 renames drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c to sound/soc/codecs/arizona-jack.c
>> but it does not touch any other files under sound/soc (including NOT touching
>> sound/soc/codecs/Makefile that is done in a later patch). So it cannot cause any
>> conflicts.
>> Mark, would merging 1-6 through the MFD tree, and you applying the rest
>> (which are all ASoC patches) work for you ?
> What a faff.
> I still don't see why they can't all go in and a PR provided.

Well patch 13/13 of this set relies on 5/5 from the previous set which is
only in Mark's ASoC tree and not in the MFD tree, so splitting things over MFD + ASoC
again makes the most sense here too.

The alternative is Mark doing a PR from ASoC to MFD to get 5/5 from the previous set
in MFD first, which seems less then ideal.



 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-09 15:55    [W:0.221 / U:2.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site