lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] MUSE: Userspace backed MTD v3
Miklos,

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> The core goal of MUSE is having the complexity on the userspace side and
>> only a small MTD driver in kernelspace.
>> While playing with different approaches I realized that FUSE offers everything
>> we need. So MUSE is a little like CUSE except that it does not implement a
>> bare character device but an MTD.
>
> Looks fine.

I'm glad to hear that!

> I do wonder if MUSE should go to drivers/mtd/ instead. Long term
> goal would be move CUSE to drivers/char and move the transport part of
> fuse into net/fuse leaving only the actual filesystems (fuse and
> virtiofs) under fs/.
>
> But for now just moving the minimal interface needed for MUSE into a
> separate header (<net/fuse.h>) would work, I guess.
>
> Do you think that would make sense?

Yes, I'm all for having MUSE in drivers/mtd/.

I placed MUSE initially in fs/fuse/ because CUSE was already there and muse.c includes
fuse_i.h. So tried to be as little invasive as possible.

>>
>> Notes:
>> ------
>>
>> - OOB support is currently limited. Currently MUSE has no support for processing
>> in- and out-band in the same MTD operation. It is good enough to make JFFS2
>> happy. This limitation is because FUSE has no support more than one variable
>> length buffer in a FUSE request.
>> At least I didn’t find a good way to pass more than one buffer to a request.
>> Maybe FUSE folks can correct me. :-)
>
> If you look at fuse_do_ioctl() it does variable length input and
> output at the same time. I guess you need something similar to that.

I'll dig into this!

Thanks,
//richard

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-09 15:40    [W:0.229 / U:1.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site