lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Fix NULL pointer dereference error
From
Date
Hi Peter,

On 09/02/21 5:53 pm, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> On 2/9/21 11:00 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> bcdma_get_*() and udma_get_*() checks if bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow is
>> already allocated by checking if it has a NON NULL value. For the
>> error cases, bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow will have error value
>> and bcdma_get_*() and udma_get_*() considers this as already allocated
>> (PASS) since the error values are NON NULL. This results in
>> NULL pointer dereference error while de-referencing
>> bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow.
>
> I think this can happen when a channel request fails and we get a second
> request coming and faces with the not cleanup up tchan/rchan/bchan/rflow
> from the previous failure.
> Interesting that I have not faced with this, but it is a valid oversight
> from me.

Thank you for reviewing.

Got into this issue when all the PCIe endpoint functions were requesting
for a MEMCOPY channel (total 22 endpoint functions) specifically in
bcdma_get_bchan() where the scenario you mentioned above happened.

Vignesh asked me to fix it for all udma_get_*().
>
>> Reset the value of bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow to NULL if the allocation
>> actually fails.
>>
>> Fixes: 017794739702 ("dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Initial support for K3 BCDMA")
>> Fixes: 25dcb5dd7b7c ("dmaengine: ti: New driver for K3 UDMA")
>
> Will this patch apply at any of these?
> 25dcb5dd7b7c does not have BCDMA (bchan)
> 017794739702 does not contain PKTDMA (tflow)

I can probably split this patch
017794739702 for bchan and 25dcb5dd7b7c for bchan/rchan/tchan/rflow

>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> index 298460438bb4..aa4ef583ff83 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> @@ -1330,6 +1330,7 @@ static int bcdma_get_bchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> {
>> struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>> enum udma_tp_level tpl;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (uc->bchan) {
>> dev_dbg(ud->dev, "chan%d: already have bchan%d allocated\n",
>> @@ -1347,8 +1348,11 @@ static int bcdma_get_bchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> tpl = ud->bchan_tpl.levels - 1;
>>
>> uc->bchan = __udma_reserve_bchan(ud, tpl, -1);
>> - if (IS_ERR(uc->bchan))
>> - return PTR_ERR(uc->bchan);
>> + if (IS_ERR(uc->bchan)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(uc->bchan);
>> + uc->bchan = NULL;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> uc->tchan = uc->bchan;
>>
>> @@ -1358,6 +1362,7 @@ static int bcdma_get_bchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> static int udma_get_tchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> {
>> struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (uc->tchan) {
>> dev_dbg(ud->dev, "chan%d: already have tchan%d allocated\n",
>> @@ -1372,8 +1377,11 @@ static int udma_get_tchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> */
>> uc->tchan = __udma_reserve_tchan(ud, uc->config.channel_tpl,
>> uc->config.mapped_channel_id);
>> - if (IS_ERR(uc->tchan))
>> - return PTR_ERR(uc->tchan);
>> + if (IS_ERR(uc->tchan)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(uc->tchan);
>> + uc->tchan = NULL;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> if (ud->tflow_cnt) {
>> int tflow_id;
>> @@ -1403,6 +1411,7 @@ static int udma_get_tchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> static int udma_get_rchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> {
>> struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (uc->rchan) {
>> dev_dbg(ud->dev, "chan%d: already have rchan%d allocated\n",
>> @@ -1417,8 +1426,13 @@ static int udma_get_rchan(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> */
>> uc->rchan = __udma_reserve_rchan(ud, uc->config.channel_tpl,
>> uc->config.mapped_channel_id);
>> + if (IS_ERR(uc->rchan)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(uc->rchan);
>> + uc->rchan = NULL;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(uc->rchan);
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int udma_get_chan_pair(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> @@ -1472,6 +1486,7 @@ static int udma_get_chan_pair(struct udma_chan *uc)
>> static int udma_get_rflow(struct udma_chan *uc, int flow_id)
>> {
>> struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (!uc->rchan) {
>> dev_err(ud->dev, "chan%d: does not have rchan??\n", uc->id);
>> @@ -1485,6 +1500,11 @@ static int udma_get_rflow(struct udma_chan *uc, int flow_id)
>> }
>>
>> uc->rflow = __udma_get_rflow(ud, flow_id);
>> + if (IS_ERR(uc->rflow)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(uc->rflow);
>> + uc->rflow = NULL;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(uc->rflow);
>
> return 0;

Will fix this.

Thanks
Kishon

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-09 13:49    [W:0.115 / U:5.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site