lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [v7 PATCH 07/12] mm: vmscan: use a new flag to indicate shrinker is registered
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:46:41AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> Currently registered shrinker is indicated by non-NULL shrinker->nr_deferred.
> This approach is fine with nr_deferred at the shrinker level, but the following
> patches will move MEMCG_AWARE shrinkers' nr_deferred to memcg level, so their
> shrinker->nr_deferred would always be NULL. This would prevent the shrinkers
> from unregistering correctly.
>
> Remove SHRINKER_REGISTERING since we could check if shrinker is registered
> successfully by the new flag.
>
> Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/shrinker.h | 7 ++++---
> mm/vmscan.c | 31 +++++++++----------------------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> index 0f80123650e2..1eac79ce57d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
> +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> @@ -79,13 +79,14 @@ struct shrinker {
> #define DEFAULT_SEEKS 2 /* A good number if you don't know better. */
>
> /* Flags */
> -#define SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE (1 << 0)
> -#define SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE (1 << 1)
> +#define SHRINKER_REGISTERED (1 << 0)
> +#define SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE (1 << 1)
> +#define SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE (1 << 2)
> /*
> * It just makes sense when the shrinker is also MEMCG_AWARE for now,
> * non-MEMCG_AWARE shrinker should not have this flag set.
> */
> -#define SHRINKER_NONSLAB (1 << 2)
> +#define SHRINKER_NONSLAB (1 << 3)
>
> extern int prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> extern void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 273efbf4d53c..a047980536cf 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -315,19 +315,6 @@ void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * We allow subsystems to populate their shrinker-related
> - * LRU lists before register_shrinker_prepared() is called
> - * for the shrinker, since we don't want to impose
> - * restrictions on their internal registration order.
> - * In this case shrink_slab_memcg() may find corresponding
> - * bit is set in the shrinkers map.
> - *
> - * This value is used by the function to detect registering
> - * shrinkers and to skip do_shrink_slab() calls for them.
> - */
> -#define SHRINKER_REGISTERING ((struct shrinker *)~0UL)
> -
> static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr);
>
> static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> @@ -336,7 +323,7 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>
> down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> /* This may call shrinker, so it must use down_read_trylock() */
> - id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, SHRINKER_REGISTERING, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (id < 0)
> goto unlock;
>
> @@ -499,10 +486,7 @@ void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> {
> down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> - if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
> - idr_replace(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, shrinker->id);
> -#endif
> + shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
> up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> }
>
> @@ -522,13 +506,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_shrinker);
> */
> void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> {
> - if (!shrinker->nr_deferred)
> + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED))
> return;
> - if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
> - unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
> +
> down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> list_del(&shrinker->list);
> + shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
> up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> +
> + if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
> + unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);

Because unregister_memcg_shrinker() will take and release shrinker_rwsem once again,
I wonder if it's better to move it into the locked section and change the calling
convention to require the caller to take the semaphore?

> kfree(shrinkrem->nr_deferred);
> shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
> }
> @@ -693,7 +680,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> struct shrinker *shrinker;
>
> shrinker = idr_find(&shrinker_idr, i);
> - if (unlikely(!shrinker || shrinker == SHRINKER_REGISTERING)) {
> + if (unlikely(!shrinker || !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED))) {
> if (!shrinker)
> clear_bit(i, info->map);
> continue;
> --
> 2.26.2
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-10 03:02    [W:0.283 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site