lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: reset: add microchip sparx5 switch reset driver
From
Date
Hi Rob,

On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 16:35 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:19:21AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote:
> > This provides reset driver support for the Microchip Sparx5 PCB134
> > and
> > PCB135 reference boards.
>
> This isn't a compatible change. You need an explanation why that's
> okay
> if that's intended.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi | 14 +++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi
> > index 380281f312d8..4edbb9fcdce0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi
> > @@ -132,9 +132,17 @@ mux: mux-controller {
> >                       };
> >               };
> >
> > -             reset@611010008 {
> > -                     compatible = "microchip,sparx5-chip-reset";
> > -                     reg = <0x6 0x11010008 0x4>;
> > +             gcb_ctrl: syscon@611010000 {
> > +                     compatible = "microchip,sparx5-gcb-syscon",
> > "syscon";
> > +                     reg = <0x6 0x11010000 0x10000>;
> > +             };
> > +
> > +             reset: reset-controller@0 {
> > +                     compatible = "microchip,sparx5-switch-reset";
> > +                     reg = <0x6 0x0 0x0>;
>
> Your register length is 0?

Yes, I only use the syscons.

>
> > +                     #reset-cells = <1>;
> > +                     cpu-syscon = <&cpu_ctrl>;
>
> Can't you accomplish the same thing adding these to
> "microchip,sparx5-chip-reset"? Or possibly as a child node.
>
> Define nodes based on h/w blocks, not as containers of things you
> happen
> to want for some driver.

Yes - I think the idea of using syscons came from another reset driver,
but it probably makes more sense to just use IO ranges directly.
I will try that out.

>
> > +                     gcb-syscon = <&gcb_ctrl>;
> >               };
> >
> >               uart0: serial@600100000 {
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >

Thanks for your comments

BR
Steen


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-08 09:01    [W:0.125 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site