lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: core: Advance erase after the erase cmd has been completed
On 05/02/21 03:52PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> Wait for the erase cmd to complete and then advance the erase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 0522304f52fa..bcaa161bc7db 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -1618,12 +1618,12 @@ static int spi_nor_erase_multi_sectors(struct spi_nor *nor, u64 addr, u32 len)
> if (ret)
> goto destroy_erase_cmd_list;
>
> - addr += cmd->size;
> - cmd->count--;
> -
> ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> if (ret)
> goto destroy_erase_cmd_list;
> +
> + addr += cmd->size;
> + cmd->count--;
> }
> list_del(&cmd->list);
> kfree(cmd);
> @@ -1704,12 +1704,12 @@ static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
> if (ret)
> goto erase_err;
>
> - addr += mtd->erasesize;
> - len -= mtd->erasesize;
> -
> ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> if (ret)
> goto erase_err;
> +
> + addr += mtd->erasesize;
> + len -= mtd->erasesize;

Do these changes have any practical benefit? IMO they are worth doing
even if there is none but I'm curious what prompted this patch.

Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>

> }
>
> /* erase multiple sectors */

--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-08 13:05    [W:0.074 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site