lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC v4 3/3] vfio: platform: reset: add msi support
From
Date
Hi Vikas,

On 1/29/21 6:24 PM, Vikas Gupta wrote:
> Add msi support for Broadcom FlexRm device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
> ---
> .../platform/reset/vfio_platform_bcmflexrm.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_bcmflexrm.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_bcmflexrm.c
> index 96064ef8f629..6ca4ca12575b 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_bcmflexrm.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_bcmflexrm.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,9 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/vfio.h>
>
> #include "../vfio_platform_private.h"
>
> @@ -33,6 +35,9 @@
> #define RING_VER 0x000
> #define RING_CONTROL 0x034
> #define RING_FLUSH_DONE 0x038
> +#define RING_MSI_ADDR_LS 0x03c
> +#define RING_MSI_ADDR_MS 0x040
> +#define RING_MSI_DATA_VALUE 0x064
>
> /* Register RING_CONTROL fields */
> #define CONTROL_FLUSH_SHIFT 5
> @@ -105,8 +110,71 @@ static int vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -module_vfio_reset_handler("brcm,iproc-flexrm-mbox",
> - vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset);
> +static u32 bcm_num_msi(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
Please use the same prefix as for reset, ie. vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_get_msi
> +{
> + struct vfio_platform_region *reg = &vdev->regions[0];> +
> + return (reg->size / RING_REGS_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +static void bcm_write_msi(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_msi_write?
> + struct msi_desc *desc,
> + struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int hwirq = -1;
> + int msi_src;
> + void __iomem *ring;
> + struct vfio_platform_region *reg = &vdev->regions[0];
> +
> + if (!reg)
> + return;
why do you need this check? For this to be called, SET_IRQ IOCTL must
have been called. This can only happen after vfio_platform_open which
first calls vfio_platform_regions_init and then vfio_platform_irq_init
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_irqs; i++)
> + if (vdev->irqs[i].type == VFIO_IRQ_TYPE_MSI)
> + hwirq = vdev->irqs[i].ctx[0].hwirq;
nit: It would have been easier to record in vdev the last index of wired
interrupts and just add the index of the MSI
> +
> + if (hwirq < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + msi_src = desc->irq - hwirq;
> +
> + if (!reg->ioaddr) {
> + reg->ioaddr = ioremap(reg->addr, reg->size);
> + if (!reg->ioaddr)
pr_warn_once("")?
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ring = reg->ioaddr + msi_src * RING_REGS_SIZE;
> +
> + writel_relaxed(msg->address_lo, ring + RING_MSI_ADDR_LS);
> + writel_relaxed(msg->address_hi, ring + RING_MSI_ADDR_MS);
> + writel_relaxed(msg->data, ring + RING_MSI_DATA_VALUE);
> +}
> +
> +static struct vfio_platform_reset_node vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset_node = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .compat = "brcm,iproc-flexrm-mbox",
> + .of_reset = vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset,
> + .of_get_msi = bcm_num_msi,
> + .of_msi_write = bcm_write_msi
> +};
> +
> +static int __init vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset_module_init(void)
> +{
> + __vfio_platform_register_reset(&vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset_node);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset_module_exit(void)
> +{
> + vfio_platform_unregister_reset("brcm,iproc-flexrm-mbox",
> + vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset_module_init);
> +module_exit(vfio_platform_bcmflexrm_reset_module_exit);
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Anup Patel <anup.patel@broadcom.com>");
>

I think you should move the whole series in PATCH now.

Thanks

Eric

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-08 18:34    [W:0.257 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site