lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: Intel: Add DMI quirk table to soc_intel_is_byt_cr()
On Fri, 05 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:34:16AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:40:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:04:56PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > > > > This set has all the Acks we need to proceed. What's blocking?
>
> > > > > There's the subsystem maintainer...
>
> > > > I assume that was a question and you meant "where's"?
>
> > > > Pierre is listed as the Maintainer.
>
> > > I'm fairly sure you can see what I meant here and why there might be a
> > > concern.
>
> > So that should be a Reviewed-by and not an Acked-by then. That's fine.
>
> No, it's that there's plenty of drivers like this that are listed in
> MAINTAINERS but still generally go through subsystem trees - this is
> also true of for quite a few MFD drivers, you tend to get a bit annoyed
> (quite reasonably) whenever I mistakenly pull MFD changes for them into
> one of my trees without syncing with you.

Driver Maintainers in MFD don't sent Acks.

> > What do you want to happen with this set then?
>
> > You want it broken up?
>
> I guess, or at least a pull request so it's in my tree and I'll notice
> any coverage issues.

Okay, I'll process it.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-08 09:41    [W:0.109 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site