Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [patch 06/12] x86/entry: Convert system vectors to irq stack macro | From | Rong Chen <> | Date | Sun, 7 Feb 2021 16:15:11 +0800 |
| |
On 2/5/21 10:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:52:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: >> >> [auto build test WARNING on tip/x86/asm] >> [also build test WARNING on tip/master linus/master tip/x86/core v5.11-rc6 next-20210125] >> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. >> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in >> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] >> >> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-irq-64-Inline-irq-stack-switching/20210205-091059 >> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 5c99720b28381bb400d4f546734c34ddaf608761 >> config: x86_64-randconfig-r026-20210204 (attached as .config) >> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0 >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): >> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d91ff58e804175dd59e483c7cf236e1fe66c2187 >> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux >> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Thomas-Gleixner/x86-irq-64-Inline-irq-stack-switching/20210205-091059 >> git checkout d91ff58e804175dd59e483c7cf236e1fe66c2187 >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> make W=1 ARCH=x86_64 >> >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >> >> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> >>>> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.o: warning: objtool: sysvec_hyperv_reenlightenment()+0x7f: undefined stack state >> -- >>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.o: warning: objtool: sysvec_hyperv_callback()+0x7f: undefined stack state >>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.o: warning: objtool: sysvec_hyperv_stimer0()+0x7f: undefined stack state > It would help if you'd actually applied the patches to a tree that had > the required objtool patches as described in 0/n. Or better yet, don't > scrape emails if the 0/n includes a git link which you'll run on anyway.
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the advice, we'll add the check to our cluster, and sorry for the inconvenience.
Best Regards, Rong Chen
|  |