[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next] net: socket: use BIT_MASK for MSG_*

On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 4:20 PM Andy Shevchenko
<> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 6, 2021, <> wrote:
>> From: Menglong Dong <>
>> The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it
>> with BIT_MASK to make it clear to understand.
> It makes it more confusing if you understand the difference between BIT_MASK() and BIT(). I think you have to use the latter. And note () when referring to the function or macro.

I replaced BIT_MASK() with BIT() in the patch of v2, and it looks much
more tidy.
I can't figure out the difference between BIT() and BIT_MASK(), seems
the latter one more safe... isn't it?

Menglong Dong

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-07 04:31    [W:0.052 / U:2.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site