lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: Intel: Add DMI quirk table to soc_intel_is_byt_cr()
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:34:16AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:40:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:04:56PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

> > > > > This set has all the Acks we need to proceed. What's blocking?

> > > > There's the subsystem maintainer...

> > > I assume that was a question and you meant "where's"?

> > > Pierre is listed as the Maintainer.

> > I'm fairly sure you can see what I meant here and why there might be a
> > concern.

> So that should be a Reviewed-by and not an Acked-by then. That's fine.

No, it's that there's plenty of drivers like this that are listed in
MAINTAINERS but still generally go through subsystem trees - this is
also true of for quite a few MFD drivers, you tend to get a bit annoyed
(quite reasonably) whenever I mistakenly pull MFD changes for them into
one of my trees without syncing with you.

> What do you want to happen with this set then?

> You want it broken up?

I guess, or at least a pull request so it's in my tree and I'll notice
any coverage issues.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-05 22:15    [W:0.110 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site