lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] kernel: irq: Some words replce with better alternatives in the file timings.c
Date

Some spelling fixes and replace with other similar meaning words.


Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
kernel/irq/timings.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/timings.c b/kernel/irq/timings.c
index 773b6105c4ae..72f69e3b1e8d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/timings.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/timings.c
@@ -478,21 +478,21 @@ static inline void irq_timings_store(int irq, struct irqt_stat *irqs, u64 ts)

/*
* The interval type is u64 in order to deal with the same
- * type in our computation, that prevent mindfuck issues with
+ * type in our computation, that prevent mind blowing issues with
* overflow, sign and division.
*/
interval = ts - old_ts;

/*
* The interrupt triggered more than one second apart, that
- * ends the sequence as predictible for our purpose. In this
+ * ends the sequence as predictable for our purpose. In this
* case, assume we have the beginning of a sequence and the
- * timestamp is the first value. As it is impossible to
+ * timestamps is the first value. As it is impossible to
* predict anything at this point, return.
*
- * Note the first timestamp of the sequence will always fall
+ * Note the first timestamps of the sequence will always fall
* in this test because the old_ts is zero. That is what we
- * want as we need another timestamp to compute an interval.
+ * want as we need another timestamps to compute an interval.
*/
if (interval >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
irqs->count = 0;
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static inline void irq_timings_store(int irq, struct irqt_stat *irqs, u64 ts)
* thus the count is reinitialized.
*
* The array of values **must** be browsed in the time direction, the
- * timestamp must increase between an element and the next one.
+ * timestamps must increase between an element and the next one.
*
* Returns a nanosec time based estimation of the earliest interrupt,
* U64_MAX otherwise.
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ u64 irq_timings_next_event(u64 now)
* type but with the cost of extra computation in the
* interrupt handler hot path. We choose efficiency.
*
- * Inject measured irq/timestamp to the pattern prediction
+ * Inject measured irq/timestamps to the pattern prediction
* model while decrementing the counter because we consume the
* data from our circular buffer.
*/
--
2.30.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-05 13:37    [W:0.066 / U:2.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site