lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [patch 11/12] softirq: Allow inlining do_softirq_own_stack()
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 10:04 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> The function to switch to the irq stack on x86 is now minimal and there is
> only a single caller. Allow the stack switch to be inlined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/interrupt.h | 2 ++
> kernel/softirq.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -570,7 +570,9 @@ asmlinkage void do_softirq(void);
> asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void);
>
> #ifdef __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ
> +# ifndef __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ_INLINE
> void do_softirq_own_stack(void);
> +# endif
> #else
> static inline void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
> {

Hello

This patch and the next patch have three "#if[n]def" with
__ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ_INLINE and this one is nested in
__ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ.

I wonder if we can use __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ only.

For example, we can move "void do_softirq_own_stack(void);" to around
the code where __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ are defined in very ARCHs.
(And for x86, do_softirq_own_stack() is a macro instead of function
declaration as next patch shows)

Thanks
Lai

> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@
> #include <linux/tick.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
>
> +#ifdef __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ_INLINE
> +# include <asm/irq_stack.h>
> +#endif
> +
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/irq.h>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-05 11:20    [W:0.260 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site