lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: X86: Expose PKS to guest
From
Date
On 05/02/21 10:56, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:25:48AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 05/02/21 09:37, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
>>> index 57718716cc70..8027f854c600 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
>>> @@ -390,3 +390,9 @@ void pks_key_free(int pkey)
>>> __clear_bit(pkey, &pks_key_allocation_map);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pks_key_free);
>>> +
>>> +u32 get_current_pkrs(void)
>>> +{
>>> + return this_cpu_read(pkrs_cache);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_current_pkrs);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pkeys.h b/include/linux/pkeys.h
>>> index bed0e293f13b..480429020f4c 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/pkeys.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/pkeys.h
>>> @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ static inline void pks_mk_readwrite(int pkey)
>>> {
>>> pr_err("%s is not valid without PKS support\n", __func__);
>>> }
>>> +static inline u32 get_current_pkrs(void)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SUPERVISOR_PKEYS */
>>
>> This would need an ack from the x86 people. Andy, Boris?
>
> This looks like the PKS baremetal pile needs to be upstream first.

Yes, it does. I would like to have an ack for including the above two
hunks once PKS is upstream.

I also have CET and bus lock #DB queued and waiting for the bare metal
functionality, however they do not touch anything outside arch/x86/kvm.

Paolo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-05 11:18    [W:0.063 / U:0.744 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site