lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 05/11] iio: buffer: group attr count and attr alloc
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 7:57 PM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:50:59 +0200
> Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
>
> > If we want to merge the attributes of the buffer/ and scan_elements/
> > directories, we'll need to count all attributes first, then (depending on
> > the attribute group) either allocate 2 attribute groups, or a single one.
>
> Probably want to note why we might want to do 2 or 1 group here as it
> sounds weird without knowing where this is going.

ack

>
> >
> > This change moves the allocation of the buffer/ attributes closer to the
> > allocation of the scan_elements/ attributes to make grouping easier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> This is fine, but one comment on a possible tidy up for another day inline.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > index cc846988fdb9..23f22be62cc7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > @@ -1257,41 +1257,16 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > {
> > struct iio_dev_attr *p;
> > struct attribute **attr;
> > - int ret, i, attrn, attrcount;
> > + int ret, i, attrn, scan_el_attrcount, buffer_attrcount;
> > const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> >
> > - attrcount = 0;
> > + buffer_attrcount = 0;
> > if (buffer->attrs) {
> > - while (buffer->attrs[attrcount] != NULL)
> > - attrcount++;
> > + while (buffer->attrs[buffer_attrcount] != NULL)
> > + buffer_attrcount++;
> > }
> >
> > - attr = kcalloc(attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs) + 1,
> > - sizeof(struct attribute *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!attr)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - memcpy(attr, iio_buffer_attrs, sizeof(iio_buffer_attrs));
> > - if (!buffer->access->set_length)
> > - attr[0] = &dev_attr_length_ro.attr;
> > -
> > - if (buffer->access->flags & INDIO_BUFFER_FLAG_FIXED_WATERMARK)
> > - attr[2] = &dev_attr_watermark_ro.attr;
> > -
> > - if (buffer->attrs)
> > - memcpy(&attr[ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)], buffer->attrs,
> > - sizeof(struct attribute *) * attrcount);
> > -
> > - attr[attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)] = NULL;
> > -
> > - buffer->buffer_group.name = "buffer";
> > - buffer->buffer_group.attrs = attr;
> > -
> > - ret = iio_device_register_sysfs_group(indio_dev, &buffer->buffer_group);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto error_free_buffer_attrs;
> > -
> > - attrcount = 0;
> > + scan_el_attrcount = 0;
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list);
> > channels = indio_dev->channels;
> > if (channels) {
> > @@ -1304,7 +1279,7 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > &channels[i]);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > goto error_cleanup_dynamic;
> > - attrcount += ret;
> > + scan_el_attrcount += ret;
> > if (channels[i].type == IIO_TIMESTAMP)
> > indio_dev->scan_index_timestamp =
> > channels[i].scan_index;
> > @@ -1319,9 +1294,37 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + attr = kcalloc(buffer_attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs) + 1,
> > + sizeof(struct attribute *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!attr) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto error_free_scan_mask;
> > + }
> > +
> > + memcpy(attr, iio_buffer_attrs, sizeof(iio_buffer_attrs));
> > + if (!buffer->access->set_length)
> > + attr[0] = &dev_attr_length_ro.attr;
> > +
> > + if (buffer->access->flags & INDIO_BUFFER_FLAG_FIXED_WATERMARK)
> > + attr[2] = &dev_attr_watermark_ro.attr;
>
> Again a comment for the future rather than now, but when we are copying
> 4 items and then looking at whether to change 2 of them it might be cleaner
> to just set them directly! Touch of bit rot here :)

So, I've been on-and-off about how to deal with this one.
I wanted to clean it in various ways using new kernel sysfs APIs.
Maybe, also remove the readonly variants and use the is_visible()
property to set RO/RW modes.
But I also came to the conclusion that this is an idea to address later.
Trying to address this early-on confused me with other overlapping changes.

>
> > +
> > + if (buffer->attrs)
> > + memcpy(&attr[ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)], buffer->attrs,
> > + sizeof(struct attribute *) * buffer_attrcount);
> > +
> > + buffer_attrcount += ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs);
> > + attr[buffer_attrcount] = NULL;
> > +
> > + buffer->buffer_group.name = "buffer";
> > + buffer->buffer_group.attrs = attr;
> > +
> > + ret = iio_device_register_sysfs_group(indio_dev, &buffer->buffer_group);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error_free_buffer_attrs;
> > +
> > buffer->scan_el_group.name = iio_scan_elements_group_name;
> >
> > - buffer->scan_el_group.attrs = kcalloc(attrcount + 1,
> > + buffer->scan_el_group.attrs = kcalloc(scan_el_attrcount + 1,
> > sizeof(buffer->scan_el_group.attrs[0]),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (buffer->scan_el_group.attrs == NULL) {
> > @@ -1341,12 +1344,12 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> >
> > error_free_scan_el_attrs:
> > kfree(buffer->scan_el_group.attrs);
> > +error_free_buffer_attrs:
> > + kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
> > error_free_scan_mask:
> > bitmap_free(buffer->scan_mask);
> > error_cleanup_dynamic:
> > iio_free_chan_devattr_list(&buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list);
> > -error_free_buffer_attrs:
> > - kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-05 09:14    [W:0.095 / U:0.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site