lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] security: replace indirect calls with static calls
----- On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Then we should be able to generate the following using static keys as a
>> jump table and N static calls:
>>
>> jump <static key label target>
>> label_N:
>> stack setup
>> call
>> label_N-1:
>> stack setup
>> call
>> label_N-2:
>> stack setup
>> call
>> ...
>> label_0:
>> jump end
>> label_fallback:
>> <iteration and indirect calls>
>> end:
>>
>> So the static keys would be used to jump to the appropriate label (using
>> a static branch, which has pretty much 0 overhead). Static calls would
>> be used to implement each of the calls.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>
> At some point I tried to extend the static_branch infra to do multiple
> targets and while the low level plumbing is trivial, I ran into trouble
> trying to get a sane C level API for it.

Did you try doing an API for a variable number of targets, or was it for
a specific number of targets ? It might be easier to just duplicate some
of the API code for number of targets between 2 and 12, and let the
users code choose the maximum number of targets they want to accelerate.

Thanks,

Mathieu


--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-06 00:40    [W:0.088 / U:19.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site