[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: ufs-debugfs: Add user-defined exception_event_mask
On 4/02/21 4:58 pm, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 11:56 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> Hallo Adrian
>> Hi Bean
>> Thanks for the review
>>> Would you like sharing the advantage of this debugfs node comparing
>>> to
>>> sysfs node "attributes/exception_event_control(if it is writable)"?
>> Primarily this is being done as a debug interface, but the user's
>> exception
>> events also need to be kept separate from the driver's ones.
>>> what is the value of this?
>> To be able to determine if the UFS device is being affected by
>> exception events.
>>> Also, now I can disable/enable UFS event over ufs-bsg.
>> That will be overwritten by the driver when it updates the e.g. bkops
>> control, or sometimes also suspend/resume.
> Hi Adrian
> yes, I saw that, they are not tracked by driver.
> I have one question that why "exception_event_mask" cannot represent
> the current QUERY_ATTR_IDN_EE_CONTROL value? only after writing it.

It represents only the user's exception events (ee_usr_mask), not the
driver's ones (ee_drv_mask) as well. ee_usr_mask is updated after
successfully ensuring it is set on the device.

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-04 16:30    [W:10.919 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site