lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 23/26] KVM: arm64: Refactor __populate_fault_info()
On Wednesday 03 Feb 2021 at 15:58:32 (+0000), Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:15:21PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > Refactor __populate_fault_info() to introduce __get_fault_info() which
> > will be used once the host is wrapped in a stage 2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 36 +++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> > index 84473574c2e7..e9005255d639 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> > @@ -157,19 +157,9 @@ static inline bool __translate_far_to_hpfar(u64 far, u64 *hpfar)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline bool __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +static inline bool __get_fault_info(u64 esr, u64 *far, u64 *hpfar)
>
> Could this take a pointer to a struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info instead?

The disr_el1 field will be unused in this case, but yes, that should
work.

Cheers,
Quentin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-04 15:36    [W:0.154 / U:1.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site