lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rt2x00: remove duplicate word in comment
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:

> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote:
> > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
> >
> > remove duplicate word 'we' in comment
> >
> > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index
> > c861811..7158152 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7
> > +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities
> > * either the alignment is already present between
> > * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we
> > - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len
> > + * have to move the header less then the iv_len
>
> s/then/than/
>
> > * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes
> > * for the iv data.
> > * When the alignment must be added manually we must
> >
>
>

Hi Randy,
So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore
the patch. thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-04 04:10    [W:0.061 / U:0.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site