lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rt2x00: remove duplicate word in comment
From
Date
On 2/3/21 4:30 PM, wengjianfeng wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote:
>>> From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
>>>
>>> remove duplicate word 'we' in comment
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c
>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index
>>> c861811..7158152 100644 ---
>>> a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++
>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7
>>> +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities
>>> * either the alignment is already present between
>>> * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we
>>> - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len
>>> + * have to move the header less then the iv_len
>>
>> s/then/than/
>>
>>> * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes
>>> * for the iv data.
>>> * When the alignment must be added manually we must
>>>
>>
>>
>
> Hi Randy,
> So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore
> the patch. thanks.

No, I mean that there is a typo there also: "then" should be changed to "than"
while you are making changes.

thanks.
--
~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-04 01:35    [W:0.052 / U:3.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site