lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: mte: Enable TCO in functions that can read beyond buffer limits
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:05:32PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:56:46AM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> > On 2/22/21 5:58 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > We'll still have an issue with dynamically switching the async/sync mode
> > > at run-time. Luckily kasan doesn't do this now. The problem is that
> > > until the last CPU have been switched from async to sync, we can't
> > > toggle the static label. When switching from sync to async, we need
> > > to do it on the first CPU being switched.
> >
> > I totally agree on this point. In the case of runtime switching we might need
> > the rethink completely the strategy and depends a lot on what we want to allow
> > and what not. For the kernel I imagine we will need to expose something in sysfs
> > that affects all the cores and then maybe stop_machine() to propagate it to all
> > the cores. Do you think having some of the cores running in sync mode and some
> > in async is a viable solution?
>
> stop_machine() is an option indeed. I think it's still possible to run
> some cores in async while others in sync but the static key here would
> only be toggled when no async CPUs are left.

Just as a general point, but if we expose stop_machine() via sysfs we
probably want to limit that to privileged users so you can't DoS the system
by spamming into the file.

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-23 13:51    [W:0.043 / U:29.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site