lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] iommu/tegra-smmu: Fix mc errors on tegra124-nyan
From
Date
23.02.2021 05:13, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:16:22AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 19.02.2021 01:07, Nicolin Chen пишет:
>>> Commit 25938c73cd79 ("iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework tegra_smmu_probe_device()")
>>> removed certain hack in the tegra_smmu_probe() by relying on IOMMU core to
>>> of_xlate SMMU's SID per device, so as to get rid of tegra_smmu_find() and
>>> tegra_smmu_configure() that are typically done in the IOMMU core also.
>>>
>>> This approach works for both existing devices that have DT nodes and other
>>> devices (like PCI device) that don't exist in DT, on Tegra210 and Tegra3
>>> upon testing. However, Page Fault errors are reported on tegra124-Nyan:
>>>
>>> tegra-mc 70019000.memory-controller: display0a: read @0xfe056b40:
>>> EMEM address decode error (SMMU translation error [--S])
>>> tegra-mc 70019000.memory-controller: display0a: read @0xfe056b40:
>>> Page fault (SMMU translation error [--S])
>>>
>>> After debugging, I found that the mentioned commit changed some function
>>> callback sequence of tegra-smmu's, resulting in enabling SMMU for display
>>> client before display driver gets initialized. I couldn't reproduce exact
>>> same issue on Tegra210 as Tegra124 (arm-32) differs at arch-level code.
>>
>> Hello Nicolin,
>>
>> Could you please explain in a more details what exactly makes the
>> difference for the callback sequence?
>
> Here is a log with 5.11.0-rc6:
> https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3187849
> [dump_stack was added in some tegra-smmu functions]
>
> And here is a corresponding log with reverting the original commit:
> https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3187851
>
> Here is a log with 5.11.0-rc7-next-20210210:
> https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3210245
>
> And here is a corresponding log with reverting the original commit:
> https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3210596
>
> Both failing logs show that mc errors started right after client DC
> got enabled by ->attach_dev() callback that in the passing logs was
> not called until Host1x driver init. And note that two failing logs
> show that ->attach_dev() could be called from two different sources,
> of_dma_configure_id() or arch_setup_dma_ops().
>
> The reason why ->attach_dev() gets called is probably related to the
> following reasons (sorry, can't be 100% sure as I don't have Tegra124
> or other 32bit Tegra board to test):
> 1) With the commit reverted, all clients are probed in "arch" stage,
> which is even prior to iommu core initialization -- including it
> setting default domain type. This probably messed up the type of
> allocating domains against the default domain type. Also internal
> group is somehow affected. So some condition check in iommu core
> failed and then it bypassed ->attach_dev callback in really_probe
> stage, until Host1x driver does attach_dev again.
>
> 2) 32bit ARM has arch_setup_dma_ops() does an additional set of iommu
> domain allocation + attach_dev(), after of_dma_configure_id() did
> once. This isn't reproducible for me on Tegra210.
>
> As debugging online isn't very efficient, and given that Thierry has
> been working on the linear mapping of framebuffer carveout, I choose
> to partially revert as a quick fix.

The partially revert should be okay, but it's not clear to me what makes
difference for T124 since I don't see that problem on T30, which also
has active display at a boot time.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-23 06:12    [W:0.048 / U:3.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site