lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: Disable GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY for s390
From
Date
On 2/22/21 7:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:18 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/22/21 4:05 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 02:56:50PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> Commit 334ef6ed06fa ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !S390") disabled
>>>> COMPILE_TEST for s390. At the same time, "make allmodconfig/allyesconfig" for
>>>> s390 is still supported. However, it generates thousands of compiler
>>>> messages such as the following, making it highly impractical to run.
>>>>
>>>> Cyclomatic Complexity 1 scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c:main
>>>> Cyclomatic Complexity 1 scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c:_GLOBAL__sub_I_00100_0_main
>>>>
>>>> Since GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY is primarily used for testing, disable it
>>>> when building s390 images.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> Fixes: 334ef6ed06fa ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !S390")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>> ---
>>>> scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig b/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
>>>> index ab9eb4cbe33a..5e9bb500f443 100644
>>>> --- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ if GCC_PLUGINS
>>>>
>>>> config GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY
>>>> bool "Compute the cyclomatic complexity of a function" if EXPERT
>>>> - depends on !COMPILE_TEST # too noisy
>>>> + depends on !COMPILE_TEST && !S390 # too noisy
>>>
>>> I don't see a reason to disable this in general for s390. COMPILE_TEST
>>> was only disabled for s390 because a lot of irrelevant configs didn't
>>> compile and it would cause a lot of unnecessary work to fix that.
>>>
>>> However the !COMPILE_TEST dependency here looks more like it was
>>> misused in lack of a possibility to detect if the config was generated
>>> with allyesconfig/allmodconfig. Maybe that could be added somehow to
>>> Kconfig?
>>>
>>
>> That is what COMPILE_TEST used to be for. Not setting it for s390 doesn't
>> just cause this config to be disabled. Lots of other compile tests
>> for s390 are now disabled as well, and code which should be disabled
>> is now enabled. Looking at it, I'd be a bit surprised if allmodconfig/
>> allyesconfig with COMPILE_TEST=y still builds for s390.
>>
>> I agree that COMPILE_TEST it is being misused. However, I think what
>> you'd be looking for is something like COMPILE_TEST_RANDCONFIG.
>> FWIW, in my opinion, randconfig should not enable COMPILE_TEST
>> to start with. But that is a different discussion.
>>
>> Anyway, I can disable GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY manually in my own
>> build tests, so this isn't that much of a problem for me, so feel
>> free to drop this patch.
>>
>> Guenter
>
>
> Maybe, we can add something like CONFIG_SUPPRESS_NOISY_TESTS,
> which is set to y by all{yes,mod}config.
>
> This is self-documenting, so we do not need the '# too noisy' comment.
>
>
>
> config SUPPRESS_NOISY_TESTS
> bool "suppress noisy test"
>
>
> config GCC_PLUGIN_CYC_COMPLEXITY
> bool "Compute the cyclomatic complexity of a function" if EXPERT
> depends on !SUPPRESS_NOISY_TESTS
>

Good idea. Downside would be that it won't solve the real problem
for s390 (which is lack of allmodconfig/allyesconfig compile test
coverage because COMPILE_TEST isn't set anymore), but that is a
different problem anyway, and my original patch doesn't solve
that either.

On the other side, if that flag would be set explicitly by
all{yes,mod}config, it would really beg for being misused. We
might then as well add a new flag that is explicitly associated
with all{yes,mod}config, but not with randconfig.

Thanks,
Guenter

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-22 17:09    [W:0.053 / U:4.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site