lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 07/16] media: i2c: rdacm2x: Fix wake up delay
Hi

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 03:18:53AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:33:01PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > On 16/02/2021 17:41, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > The MAX9271 chip manual prescribes a delay of 5 milliseconds
> > > after the chip exists from low power state.
> > >
> > > Adjust the required delay in the rdacm21 camera module and add it
> > > to the rdacm20 that currently doesn't implement one.
> >
> > This sounds to me like it should be a common function in the max9271 module:
> >
> > > /* Verify communication with the MAX9271: ping to wakeup. */
> > > dev->serializer.client->addr = MAX9271_DEFAULT_ADDR;
> > > i2c_smbus_read_byte(dev->serializer.client);
> > > usleep_range(5000, 8000);
> >
> > Especially as that MAX9271_DEFAULT_ADDR should probably be handled
> > directly in the max9271.c file too, and the RDACM's shouldn't care about it.
>
> I think this is a good idea. With this addressed,

The address reprogramming was exactly why I refrained from adding a
function to the max9271 library, as handling of the addresses there
would introduce a precendece order in the function calls, ie the newly
introduced function would require to be called first after a chip
reset and that's something I considered better handled by the camera
driver (even if it wouldn't be suprising a 'wake up' function to be
called first).

please also note that I will next try to make the max9271 a proper i2c
driver so this might be even less relevant that what it is right now

Thanks
j
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>
> > If we end up moving the max9271 'library' into more of a module/device
> > then this would have to be done in it's 'probe' anyway, so it's likely
> > better handled down there...?
> >
> > But ... it's not essential at this point in the series, so if you want
> > to keep this patch as is,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c | 1 +
> > > drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c | 2 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > > index ea30cc936531..39e4b4241870 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > > @@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ static int rdacm20_initialize(struct rdacm20_device *dev)
> > > /* Verify communication with the MAX9271: ping to wakeup. */
> > > dev->serializer.client->addr = MAX9271_DEFAULT_ADDR;
> > > i2c_smbus_read_byte(dev->serializer.client);
> > > + usleep_range(5000, 8000);
> > >
> > > /* Serial link disabled during config as it needs a valid pixel clock. */
> > > ret = max9271_set_serial_link(&dev->serializer, false);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c
> > > index 179d107f494c..b22a2ca5340b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c
> > > @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int rdacm21_initialize(struct rdacm21_device *dev)
> > > /* Verify communication with the MAX9271: ping to wakeup. */
> > > dev->serializer.client->addr = MAX9271_DEFAULT_ADDR;
> > > i2c_smbus_read_byte(dev->serializer.client);
> > > - usleep_range(3000, 5000);
> > > + usleep_range(5000, 8000);
> > >
> > > /* Enable reverse channel and disable the serial link. */
> > > ret = max9271_set_serial_link(&dev->serializer, false);
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-22 16:12    [W:0.075 / U:5.864 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site