lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of: error: 'const struct kimage' has no member named 'arch'
From
Date
On 2/18/21 4:07 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:

Hi Mimi,

> On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 14:33 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() defined in drivers/of/kexec.c builds
>> a new device tree object that includes architecture specific data
>> for kexec system call. This should be defined only if the architecture
>> being built defines kexec architecture structure "struct kimage_arch".
>>
>> Define a new boolean config OF_KEXEC that is enabled if
>> CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE and CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE are enabled, and
>> the architecture is arm64 or powerpc64. Build drivers/of/kexec.c
>> if CONFIG_OF_KEXEC is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
>> Fixes: 33488dc4d61f ("of: Add a common kexec FDT setup function")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
>> drivers/of/Makefile | 7 +------
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
>> index 18450437d5d5..f2e8fa54862a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
>> @@ -100,4 +100,10 @@ config OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT
>> # arches should select this if DMA is coherent by default for OF devices
>> bool
>>
>> +config OF_KEXEC
>> + bool
>> + depends on KEXEC_FILE
>> + depends on OF_FLATTREE
>> + default y if ARM64 || PPC64
>> +
>> endif # OF
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/Makefile b/drivers/of/Makefile
>> index c13b982084a3..287579dd1695 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/of/Makefile
>> @@ -13,11 +13,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_RESERVED_MEM) += of_reserved_mem.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_RESOLVE) += resolver.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_NUMA) += of_numa.o
>> -
>> -ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
>> -ifdef CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE
>> -obj-y += kexec.o
>> -endif
>> -endif
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_KEXEC) += kexec.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST) += unittest-data/
>
> Is it possible to reuse CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC here?
>

For ppc64 CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC is selected when CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE is
enabled. So I don't see a problem in reusing CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC for ppc.

But for arm64, CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC is enabled in the final patch in
the patch set (the one for carrying forward IMA log across kexec for
arm64). arm64 calls of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt() prior to enabling
CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC and hence breaks the build for arm64.

thanks,
-lakshmi





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-19 01:58    [W:0.080 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site