lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11
Date
On Thu 11 Feb 2021 at 22:30, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:26:04PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20210210:
>>
>> The powerpc tree still had its build failure in the allyesconfig for
>> which I applied a supplied patch.
>>
>> The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The drm-misc tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The modules tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The device-mapper tree gained a build failure so I used the version
>> from next-20210210.
>>
>> The tip tree lost its boot failure.
>>
>> The rcu tree gained conflicts against the block tree.
>>
>> The driver-core tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The akpm-current tree gained conflicts against the fscache tree.
>>
>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9533
>> 9470 files changed, 385794 insertions(+), 266880 deletions(-)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Build fails on s390 using defconfig with:
>
> In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.h:40,
> from drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c:45:
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.h:24:29: error: field 'match_level' has incomplete type
> 24 | enum mlx5_flow_match_level match_level;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.h:27:26: warning: 'struct mlx5e_encap_entry' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
> 27 | int (*calc_hlen)(struct mlx5e_encap_entry *e);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> caused by this:
> commit 0d9f96471493d5483d116c137693f03604332a04 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
> Author: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
> Date: Sun Jan 24 22:07:04 2021 +0200
>
> net/mlx5e: Extract tc tunnel encap/decap code to dedicated file
>
> Following patches in series extend the extracted code with routing
> infrastructure. To improve code modularity created a dedicated
> tc_tun_encap.c source file and move encap/decap related code to the new
> file. Export code that is used by both regular TC code and encap/decap code
> into tc_priv.h (new header intended to be used only by TC module). Rename
> some exported functions by adding "mlx5e_" prefix to their names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmytro Linkin <dlinkin@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
>
> Note: switching on NET_SWITCHDEV fixes the build error.

Hi Heiko,

This problem is supposed to be fixed by 36280f0797df ("net/mlx5e: Fix
tc_tun.h to verify MLX5_ESWITCH config"). I'm trying to reproduce with
config supplied by test robot in another thread (config: s390-defconfig)
and current net-next builds fine for me. I've also verified that config
option you mentioned is not set in that config:

$ grep NET_SWITCHDEV .config
# CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV is not set

Can you help me reproduce?

Thanks,
Vlad

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-12 10:38    [W:0.066 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site