lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] staging: ks7010: Macros with complex values
Ok, thanks!

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 3:52 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 03:23:24PM +0300, Fatih Yildirim wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:10:44PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:57:04PM +0300, Fatih YILDIRIM wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:02:51AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:22:39PM +0300, Fatih Yildirim wrote:
> > > > > > Fix for checkpatch.pl warning:
> > > > > > Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fatih Yildirim <yildirim.fatih@gmail.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
> > > > > > index 39138191a556..c62a494ed6bb 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
> > > > > > @@ -498,20 +498,20 @@ struct hostif_mic_failure_request {
> > > > > > #define TX_RATE_FIXED 5
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* 11b rate */
> > > > > > -#define TX_RATE_1M (u8)(10 / 5) /* 11b 11g basic rate */
> > > > > > -#define TX_RATE_2M (u8)(20 / 5) /* 11b 11g basic rate */
> > > > > > -#define TX_RATE_5M (u8)(55 / 5) /* 11g basic rate */
> > > > > > -#define TX_RATE_11M (u8)(110 / 5) /* 11g basic rate */
> > > > > > +#define TX_RATE_1M ((u8)(10 / 5)) /* 11b 11g basic rate */
> > > > > > +#define TX_RATE_2M ((u8)(20 / 5)) /* 11b 11g basic rate */
> > > > > > +#define TX_RATE_5M ((u8)(55 / 5)) /* 11g basic rate */
> > > > > > +#define TX_RATE_11M ((u8)(110 / 5)) /* 11g basic rate */
> > > > >
> > > > > But these are not "complex macros" that need an extra () added to them,
> > > > > right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Checkpatch is a hint, it's not a code parser and can not always know
> > > > > what is happening. With your knowledge of C, does this look like
> > > > > something that needs to be "fixed"?
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your reply.
> > > > Actually, I'm following the Eudyptula Challenge and I'm at task 10.
> > >
> > > First rule of that challenge is that you are not allowed to talk about
> > > it in public :)
> > >
> > > That being said, you didn't answer any of my questions above :(
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Ohh no, missed the rule. Sorry for that, I feel rookie :)
> > You are right, they are not complex macros.
> > Besides that, type cast operator doesn't have the highest precedence.
> > So, I think we can use enclosing paranthesis.
>
> I don't think they are needed, see how these are used please.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-11 14:45    [W:0.073 / U:0.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site