lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] bfq: remove some useless logic of bfq_update_next_in_service()
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:13:29PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>
> > Il giorno 29 gen 2021, alle ore 11:51, Chunguang Xu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
> >
> > The if statement at the end of the function is obviously useless,
> > maybe we can delete it.
> >
>
> Thanks for spotting this mistake.
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
> > ---
> > block/bfq-wf2q.c | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> > index 26776bd..070e34a 100644
> > --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> > +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> > @@ -137,9 +137,6 @@ static bool bfq_update_next_in_service(struct bfq_sched_data *sd,
> >
> > sd->next_in_service = next_in_service;
> >
> > - if (!next_in_service)
> > - return parent_sched_may_change;
> > -

Unless I'm missing something, this has already been fixed here:

https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-5.12/block&id=1a23e06cdab2be07cbda460c6417d7de564c48e6

> > return parent_sched_may_change;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>

--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-10 16:22    [W:0.046 / U:2.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site