lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Don't check for mutex_trylock_recursive()
From
Date
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 09:52 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> mutex_trylock_recursive() has been removed from the tree, there is no
> need to check for it.
>
> Remove traces of mutex_trylock_recursive()'s existence.

Yay. Assuming patch 1 is applied, thanks.

>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 1afe3af1cc097..4b2775fd31d9d 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -7062,12 +7062,6 @@ sub process {
>   }
>   }
>  
>
> -# check for mutex_trylock_recursive usage
> - if ($line =~ /mutex_trylock_recursive/) {
> - ERROR("LOCKING",
> - "recursive locking is bad, do not use this ever.\n" . $herecurr);
> - }
> -
>  # check for lockdep_set_novalidate_class
>   if ($line =~ /^.\s*lockdep_set_novalidate_class\s*\(/ ||
>   $line =~ /__lockdep_no_validate__\s*\)/ ) {


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-10 13:45    [W:0.118 / U:2.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site