lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Don't check for mutex_trylock_recursive()
Date
mutex_trylock_recursive() has been removed from the tree, there is no
need to check for it.

Remove traces of mutex_trylock_recursive()'s existence.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 1afe3af1cc097..4b2775fd31d9d 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -7062,12 +7062,6 @@ sub process {
}
}

-# check for mutex_trylock_recursive usage
- if ($line =~ /mutex_trylock_recursive/) {
- ERROR("LOCKING",
- "recursive locking is bad, do not use this ever.\n" . $herecurr);
- }
-
# check for lockdep_set_novalidate_class
if ($line =~ /^.\s*lockdep_set_novalidate_class\s*\(/ ||
$line =~ /__lockdep_no_validate__\s*\)/ ) {
--
2.30.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-10 09:57    [W:0.073 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site