[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mm: cma: support sysfs
On 2/9/21 11:26 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> I just am not especially happy about the inability to do natural, efficient
>> things here, such as use a statically allocated set of things with sysfs. And
>> I remain convinced that the above is not "improper"; it's a reasonable
>> step, given the limitations of the current sysfs design. I just wanted to say
>> that out loud, as my proposal sinks to the bottom of the trench here. haha :)
> What is "odd" is that you are creating an object in the kernel that you
> _never_ free. That's not normal at all in the kernel, and so, your wish
> to have a kobject that you never free represent this object also is not
> normal :)

OK, thanks for taking the time to explain that, much appreciated!

John Hubbard

 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-10 08:54    [W:0.112 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site