Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID | From | Stefan Berger <> | Date | Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:35:07 -0500 |
| |
On 2/1/21 8:23 AM, David Howells wrote: > Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> >> >> Detect whether a key is an sm2 type of key by its OID in the parameters >> array rather than assuming that everything under OID_id_ecPublicKey >> is sm2, which is not the case. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> >> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> >> Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org > I presume these cc's are intentionally not on the first patch or the cover (if > there is one)?
No, this is not intentional. I guess this is a case of wrong use of cc: versus mailing lists - my bad. I posted the whole series to linux-crypto, linux-integrity, keyrings and lkml.
V6 is at least visible here now:
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/31/323
- https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=161213604618722&w=2
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210131233301.1301787-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com/T/#mbc9fae5facb4178f64c1145e2654258c0af8fa96
- https://marc.info/?l=linux-keyrings&m=161213608818735&w=2
> > Do you have a branch you want me to pull or did you want me to take just > patches 2-4?
Please take it from the mailing list. If there are requests for more changes on the crypto level, I will send another series. I personally am waiting for some sort of verdict on the crypto level...
Stefan
| |