lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/9] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Forbid huge pmd sharing when uffd enabled
From
Date
On 1/28/21 2:48 PM, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>
> Huge pmd sharing could bring problem to userfaultfd. The thing is that
> userfaultfd is running its logic based on the special bits on page table
> entries, however the huge pmd sharing could potentially share page table
> entries for different address ranges. That could cause issues on either:
>
> - When sharing huge pmd page tables for an uffd write protected range, the
> newly mapped huge pmd range will also be write protected unexpectedly, or,
>
> - When we try to write protect a range of huge pmd shared range, we'll first
> do huge_pmd_unshare() in hugetlb_change_protection(), however that also
> means the UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT could be silently skipped for the shared
> region, which could lead to data loss.
>
> Since at it, a few other things are done altogether:
>
> - Move want_pmd_share() from mm/hugetlb.c into linux/hugetlb.h, because
> that's definitely something that arch code would like to use too
>
> - ARM64 currently directly check against CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE when
> trying to share huge pmd. Switch to the want_pmd_share() helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 3 +--
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 9 +++++++++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 5 ++---
> 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index 5b32ec888698..1a8ce0facfe8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -284,8 +284,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> */
> ptep = pte_alloc_map(mm, pmdp, addr);
> } else if (sz == PMD_SIZE) {
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE) &&
> - pud_none(READ_ONCE(*pudp)))
> + if (want_pmd_share(vma) && pud_none(READ_ONCE(*pudp)))
> ptep = huge_pmd_share(mm, addr, pudp);
> else
> ptep = (pte_t *)pmd_alloc(mm, pudp, addr);
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 1e0abb609976..4508136c8376 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/kref.h>
> #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> +#include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
>
> struct ctl_table;
> struct user_struct;
> @@ -947,4 +948,18 @@ static inline __init void hugetlb_cma_check(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static inline bool want_pmd_share(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD
> + if (uffd_disable_huge_pmd_share(vma))
> + return false;

We are testing for uffd conditions that prevent sharing to determine if
huge_pmd_share should be called. Since we have the vma, perhaps we should
do the vma_sharable() test here as well? Or, perhaps delay all checks
until we are in huge_pmd_share and add uffd_disable_huge_pmd_share to
vma_sharable?

--
Mike Kravetz

> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
> + return true;
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_HUGETLB_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> index a8e5f3ea9bb2..c63ccdae3eab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> +++ b/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,15 @@ static inline bool is_mergeable_vm_userfaultfd_ctx(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx == vm_ctx.ctx;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Never enable huge pmd sharing on uffd-wp registered vmas, because uffd-wp
> + * protect information is per pgtable entry.
> + */
> +static inline bool uffd_disable_huge_pmd_share(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + return vma->vm_flags & VM_UFFD_WP;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool userfaultfd_missing(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> return vma->vm_flags & VM_UFFD_MISSING;
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 07b23c81b1db..d46f50a99ff1 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -5371,7 +5371,7 @@ int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> *addr = ALIGN(*addr, HPAGE_SIZE * PTRS_PER_PTE) - HPAGE_SIZE;
> return 1;
> }
> -#define want_pmd_share() (1)
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE */
> pte_t *huge_pmd_share(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pud_t *pud)
> {
> @@ -5388,7 +5388,6 @@ void adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long *start, unsigned long *end)
> {
> }
> -#define want_pmd_share() (0)
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB
> @@ -5410,7 +5409,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pte = (pte_t *)pud;
> } else {
> BUG_ON(sz != PMD_SIZE);
> - if (want_pmd_share() && pud_none(*pud))
> + if (want_pmd_share(vma) && pud_none(*pud))
> pte = huge_pmd_share(mm, addr, pud);
> else
> pte = (pte_t *)pmd_alloc(mm, pud, addr);
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-02-01 23:07    [W:0.234 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site