lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] platform: finally disallow IRQ0 in platform_get_irq() and its ilk
From
Date
On 12/9/21 11:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

>> The commit a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is
>> invalid") only calls WARN() when IRQ0 is about to be returned, however
>> using IRQ0 is considered invalid (according to Linus) outside the arch/
>> code where it's used by the i8253 drivers. Many driver subsystems treat
>> 0 specially (e.g. as an indication of the polling mode by libata), so
>> the users of platform_get_irq[_byname]() in them would have to filter
>> out IRQ0 explicitly and this (quite obviously) doesn't scale...
>> Let's finally get this straight and return -EINVAL instead of IRQ0!
>
> You are changing the return value of platform_get_irq_optional().
> The problem here is the proposed change doesn't bring any value in such
> case. platform_get_irq_optional() should be able (at the end of the day)
> to return 3 types of values (as other APIs do):
> > 0: success
> == 0: IRQ not found
> < 0: an error that must be consumed by the caller

I remember that was in your patch that got reverted right after being merged. ;-)
IMHO returning both error code and 0 on failure is a sign of a misdesigned API, it
makes the failure check unnecessarily complex and error prone.

> 0 is unexpected result for non-optional APIs and there you may try to play
> tricks (like replacing it by error code).
>
> There was a discussion around the topic:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210331144526.19439-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/T/#u

I don't see much of the discussion there...

> Wanna help?

No, I'm afraid you're on your own here...

>> Fixes: a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is invalid")
>
> Not sure.

Why? It fixes gthe IRQ0 problem, so that you don't have to check for IRQ0 in many callers
(for the subsytems that treat 0 as s/th special, like polling mode)... If you have something
to improve, you can do that atop of this patch...

MBR, Sergey

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-09 21:22    [W:0.182 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site