Messages in this thread | | | From | Vitaly Kuznetsov <> | Subject | Re: ** POTENTIAL FRAUD ALERT - RED HAT ** RE: [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: x86: Add checks for reserved-to-zero Hyper-V hypercall fields | Date | Fri, 03 Dec 2021 15:09:27 +0100 |
| |
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@microsoft.com> writes:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 6:13 PM >> >> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> > Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes: >> > >> > > Add checks for the three fields in Hyper-V's hypercall params that must >> > > be zero. Per the TLFS, HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT is returned if >> > > "A reserved bit in the specified hypercall input value is non-zero." >> > > >> > > Note, the TLFS has an off-by-one bug for the last reserved field, which >> > > it defines as being bits 64:60. The same section states "The input field >> > > 64-bit value called a hypercall input value.", i.e. bit 64 doesn't >> > > exist. >> > >> > This version are you looking at? I can't see this issue in 6.0b >> >> It's the web-based documentation, the 6.0b PDF indeed does not have the same bug. >> >> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/tlfs/hypercall-interface#hypercall-inputs > > Did you (or Vitaly) file a bug report on this doc issue? If not, I can do so. >
Done, https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/Virtualization-Documentation/pull/1682
-- Vitaly
| |