lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: Powerzone new bindings
From
Date

Hi Rob,

are you fine with these bindings?

On 02/12/2021 15:42, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 17:41, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:

[ ... ]

> This looks good to me, feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> ---
>> V3:
>> - Removed required property 'compatible'
>> - Removed powerzone-cells from the topmost node
>> - Removed powerzone-cells from cpus 'consumers' in example
>> - Set additionnal property to false
>> V2:
>> - Added pattern properties and stick to powerzone-*
>> - Added required property compatible and powerzone-cells
>> - Added additionnal property
>> - Added compatible
>> - Renamed to 'powerzones'
>> - Added missing powerzone-cells to the topmost node
>> - Fixed errors reported by 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>> V1: Initial post
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/power/powerzones.yaml | 97 +++++++++++++++++++

[ ... ]

--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-12-03 09:20    [W:0.150 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site