Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:02:12 +0900 | Subject | Re: [loop] e3f9387aea: stress-ng.loop.ops_per_sec 78.9% improvement | From | Tetsuo Handa <> |
| |
On 2021/12/15 22:58, kernel test robot wrote: > > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a 78.9% improvement of stress-ng.loop.ops_per_sec due to commit: > > > commit: e3f9387aea67742b9d1f4de8e5bb2fd08a8a4584 ("loop: Use pr_warn_once() for loop_control_remove() warning") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master >
Avoiding printk() flooding will reduce latency, but I'm curious why the testing program is trying ioctl(fd, LOOP_CTL_REMOVE, -1) ? Since such ioctl() is pointless, measuring ops_per_sec is also pointless...
| |