lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'
Hi Arnd,

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 2:50 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:38 PM Naresh Kamboju
> <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > While building Linux next 20211123 tag for sh with gcc-11
> > following warnings / errors noticed.
>
> Nothing in here looks like a recent regression from either the kernel
> or gcc-11.

Except for:

kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of
function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean
'_raw_write_lock_nested'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
306 | __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| _raw_write_lock_nested

Which was also reported for other architectures:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202111201111.c2ApGeHR-lkp@intel.com/

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-23 15:49    [W:0.191 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site