Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:25:51 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove need for a vcpu from kvm_slot_page_track_is_active | From | Paolo Bonzini <> |
| |
On 11/16/21 00:45, Ben Gardon wrote: > kvm_slot_page_track_is_active only uses its vCPU argument to get a > pointer to the assoicated struct kvm, so just pass in the struct KVM to > remove the need for a vCPU pointer. > > No functional change intended. > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 2 +- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 4 ++-- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h > index 9d4a3b1b25b9..e99a30a4d38b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm, > void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, > enum kvm_page_track_mode mode); > -bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > +bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, > enum kvm_page_track_mode mode); > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > index 2ada6dee920a..7d0da79668c0 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > @@ -2587,7 +2587,7 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, > * track machinery is used to write-protect upper-level shadow pages, > * i.e. this guards the role.level == 4K assertion below! > */ > - if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)) > + if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)) > return -EPERM; > > /* > @@ -3884,7 +3884,7 @@ static bool page_fault_handle_page_track(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > * guest is writing the page which is write tracked which can > * not be fixed by page fault handler. > */ > - if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu, fault->slot, fault->gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)) > + if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu->kvm, fault->slot, fault->gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)) > return true; > > return false; > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c > index cc4eb5b7fb76..35c221d5f6ce 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page); > /* > * check if the corresponding access on the specified guest page is tracked. > */ > -bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > +bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, > enum kvm_page_track_mode mode) > { > @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ bool kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > return false; > > if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE && > - !kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(vcpu->kvm)) > + !kvm_page_track_write_tracking_enabled(kvm)) > return false; > > index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PG_LEVEL_4K); >
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
| |