Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:18:56 +0200 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev |
| |
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 08:43:16AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > > > On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > > > + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information > > > > > > Preferably: "I2C" > > > > Why? > > See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv: > > > like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree.
When is it good point to start following the spec?
> > UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the > > proper form of the abbreviation (*). > > > > *) Check UM10204.pdf. > > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
Wolfram, what do you prefer?
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |