lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 17/22] crypto: qce: Print a failure msg in case probe() fails
On Wed 10 Nov 04:59 CST 2021, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:

> Print a failure message (dev_err) in case the qcom qce crypto
> driver probe() fails.
>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/qce/core.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> index 98784d63d78c..7c90401a2ef1 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ static int qce_crypto_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> err_mem_path_disable:
> icc_set_bw(qce->mem_path, 0, 0);
> err:
> + dev_err(dev, "%s failed : %d\n", __func__, ret);

There's two possible outcomes of this style of error logging:

1) You came through a code path with a specific error message, so you
will have something that will say:

qce: Some useful error text
qce: qce_crypto_probe failed: -22

2) You came through a code path without a specific error message:

qce: qce_crypto_probe failed: -22


In the first case the second line is just pure spam, in the second case
the bare -22 is typically completely useless - given that there tend to
be just a few commonly used errno values coming from multiple possible
error sources.

As such, no thanks. If you have an error case in qce_crypto_probe() that
doesn't have a good, useful, error message, please fix that.

Regards,
Bjorn

> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-11-16 00:26    [W:1.441 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site