lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Provide extra ordering for unlock+lock pair on the same CPU
From
On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 23:54:23 PDT (-0700), boqun.feng@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 04:30:37PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> writes:
>> > (Add linux-arch in Cc list)
>> >
>> > Architecture maintainers, this patch is about strengthening our memory
>> > model a little bit, your inputs (confirmation, ack/nack, etc.) are
>> > appreciated.
>>
>> Hi Boqun,
>>
>> I don't feel like I'm really qualified to give an ack here, you and the
>> other memory model folk know this stuff much better than me.
>>
>> But I have reviewed it and it matches my understanding of how our
>> barriers work, so it looks OK to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)

I'm basically in the same spot. I think I said something to that effect
somewhere in the thread, but I'm not sure if it got picked up so

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> (RISC-V)

(I don't feel comfortable reviewing it so I'm acking it, not sure if I'm
just backwards about what all this means though ;)).

IIUC this change will mean the RISC-V port is broken, but I'm happy to
fix it. Were you guys trying to target this for 5.16?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-10-08 18:33    [W:0.101 / U:0.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site